Sunday, August 14, 2011

Peaceful Protest is a Fundamental Democratic Right

When India was ruled by the British, oppressive as the rulers were, they did not stop peaceful, non-violent forms of protest such as satyagraha.

Fast-forward to the present day, when "free" India is ruled (the word "governed" no longer applies) by a corrupt coalition of politicians led by Mr. Not Clean -- Dr. Manmohan Singh. Dr. Singh and his Congress cronies are hellbent on protecting the de-facto "Right to Corruption" that presumably allows them the clout that they currently have. So scared is the ruling coalition of a strong anti-corruption law, that in "free" India, a group of legitimate protesters are unable to get permission to launch a peaceful agitation.

If it weren't such a gross insult to democracy, it would be laughable that a peaceful protest was being scuttled. To me, the current UPA 2 is even more draconian and high-handed than the erstwhile British rulers of the past that my grandparents fought to overthrow.

Shame!

2 comments:

  1. the British did lock up Gandhi

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well so then it is fair to say the the UPA is an empire and we don't still live in a democracy.

    ReplyDelete